Limbaugh: Tests show no ailments after chest pain
Conservative talk radio show host Rush Limbaugh said Friday tests showed nothing was wrong with his heart after he was hospitalized with chest pains. Limbaugh, 58, was released from The Queen’s Medical Center two days after he was rushed there during a vacation. Doctors said he did not have a heart attack or heart disease. “The pain was real, and they don’t know what caused it,” Limbaugh said, adding his best guess was he had a spasm in an artery. Limbaugh said he was not taking painkillers. [I wonder how many liberals will have to be rushed to the hospital with chest pains after hearing this news?…ed]
Obama Approval Index Month-by-Month
When tracking President Obama’s job approval on a daily basis, people sometimes get so caught up in the day-to-day fluctuations that they miss the bigger picture. To look at the longer-term trends, Rasmussen Reports compiles the numbers on a full-month basis, and the results can be seen in the graphics below. The president’s Approval Index ratings fell three points in December following two-point declines in both October and November. Looking back, the president’s honeymoon ended quickly before his ratings stabilized from March through May. They tumbled in June and July as the health care debate began before stabilizing again over the summer. Public attitudes towards the health care legislation have hardened in recent months, with most voters opposed to the work being done in Congress. [The next time someone tries to tell you what a great job Obama is doing show them these charts indicating how the rest of America feels about his performance…ed]
Healthcare in the liberal/socialist big picture
According to Rasmussen Reports, only 34 percent of voters believe passing the healthcare bill currently before Congress is better than passing nothing at all. Only 25 percent overall actually believe they will be better off under the plan and, for seniors that drops to only 16 percent. But there is, nevertheless, a consensus. A whopping 100 percent of congressmen disapprove of the plan because none of them advocate that the proposed healthcare reform should apply to them. Still, that’s not restraining most of them from doing everything in their power to ram this legislation down the throats of the rest of us. But why? If the polls clearly indicate that the majority of Americans do not approve, plus ancillary data supporting the very real possibility of it costing Democratic Senators and Representatives their seats come the next election why are they so determined to do this to the American people? [Truth be told amendments WERE offered up by Republicans that would force Congress and federal workers now exempt from ObamaCare to be covered by the same plan as the rest of us but Democrats quickly shot those down…ed]
The prospects for revolt in 2010
Where is Nelson Mandela when we need him? In the fine new film “Invictus,” South Africa’s first black president inspects his first official paycheck. “This is terrible,” Mr. Mandela says. He decides he earns too much and subsequently donates a third of his salary to charity. (SNIP) Today’s thoughtless and corrosive spend-o-rama began under a Republican Congress and the feckless Bush-Rove administration. Alas, a Democratic White House and Congress briskly outspend their predecessors. In stunning contrast to Mr. Mandela’s example, Congress carpet-bombs taxpayer dollars on greedy federal bureaucrats – even as Americans struggle, and often fail, to pay their mortgages and rents. [The money shot in this article comes at the very end…ed]
New Media leader exposes myth of Obama’s ‘bottom-up’ Internet-driven 2008 campaign
End-of-year media pieces tend to be boring rehashes but occasionally a thoughtful person will use the opportunity for some genuinely original and useful thinking about the most recent past. Such is Micah Sifry’s powerful and significant post on Personal Democracy Forum’s Tech President, “The Obama disconnect: What happens when myth meets reality.” Remember how the Mainstream Media endlessly told us in 2008 that the Obama campaign was blazing new trails by raising millions of dollars of campaign donations and creating the first-ever bottom-up, people-driven Internet-focused presidential campaign apparatus? Sifry’s post is a must-read for those across the political spectrum who seek to understand why the truth about the Obama campaign in 2008 was almost exactly the opposite of that mythic rendition at the heart of the conventional Mainstream Media wisdom. [There isn’t anything about Obama that is real. Not only was his campaign a big face but so has his presidency. Nice work all you hopey changey dolts…ed]
Barack Obama is vulnerable on terror – and he knows it
In his weekly radio address yesterday, President Barack Obama patted himself on the back for having “refocused the fight – bringing to a responsible end the war in Iraq, which had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks”. He then told people to remember that “our adversaries are those who would attack our country, not our fellow Americans”, before decrying “fear and cynicism” and “partisanship and division” – the code phrases for horrid Republicans used during his 2008 election campaign. Complacency, faux moralising and partisan shots at Republicans. It was a neat summary of where Obama is going wrong after the Christmas Day debacle when the Nigerian knicker bomber managed to waltz onto a Detroit-bound flight. [Is Obama really “vulnerable” or would a massive terrorist attack occurring on American soil help him make good on his campaign promise to “fundamentally change this nation as we know it”? And I don’t mean in a good way…ed]